NMHRAB Awards Grants
By L. Elaine Olah
State Records Administrator
The New Mexico Historical
Records Advisory Board (NMHRAB) has completed its first-ever grant funding cycle.
Thirty-two grant proposals, totaling $161,619.09 were received against the February 15,
1999 deadline. Applicants represented counties, municipalities, State agencies, museums,
historical societies, universities, church groups, and genealogy and preservation
organizations from around the state. At its regular meeting on March 1, 1999, the NMHRAB
awarded $74,237.75 to 15 organizations, with grants ranging from $500 (the minimum) to
$8,500 (the maximum). The following table identifies the organization, the grant awarded,
the organizations match, and the total for the project.
The projects funded address a
variety of issues. One of the projects funded offers statewide, low-cost, archival
training. The training will be offered four times in various locations. Other projects
will address preservation of collections. Some will re-house documents, some propose to
microfilm/digitize records and some both. Access is the objective of other projects by
creating, automating or expanding finding aids or cataloguing records. Several projects
combine both preservation and access. A few organizations will be assessing their
collections and developing plans to organize, preserve and improve access to them.
The NMHRAB is pleased with the
level of participation it received in this funding cycle. Plans are under way to update
the grant guidelines and applications to address comments from the public and the board.
Revisions will be discussed at the May board meeting, and public comment is welcome.
Further, the board will conduct more in-depth training on the guidelines in September,
October and possibly November to assist organizations with their grant proposals. Any
comments or suggestions should be addressed to Elaine Olah at eolah@rain.state.nm.us or
1205 Camino Carlos Rey, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505.
| Applicant |
Purpose |
Funding |
| Award |
Match |
TOTAL |
| NM Preservation Alliance |
State-wide training in archival methods: Holdings
Maintenance |
3,700.00 |
1,960.00 |
5,660.00 |
| Santa Cruz Irrigation District |
Microfilm and re-house permanent records of the organization. |
8,200.00 |
3,300.00 |
11,500.00 |
| Torrance County Assessor's Office |
Repair and preserve land grant maps held by the county. |
1,009.15 |
1,435.83 |
2,444.98 |
| Town of Silver City Silver City Museum |
Photo preservation and digitization; microfilm and digitize
selected collections. |
1,699.60 |
7,537.50 |
9,237.10 |
| Santa Fe County |
Re-house original county deed books in archival containers. |
1,430.00 |
1,430.00 |
2,860.00 |
| NM Highlands University |
Catalogue and re-house the Fort Union Files at Donnelly
Library |
7,820.00 |
32,716.00 |
40,536.00 |
| Lincoln County Historical Society |
Assessment and strategic plan for collection, preservation and
maintenance and access to historic documents held in the county. |
6,245.00 |
2,780.00 |
9,025.00 |
| NM State University Regents |
Improve and automate finding aids to 20 collections in the
NMSU Library agriculture collections in preparation for the New Mexico Online Archive
Catalogue project. |
8,500.00 |
7,500.00 |
16,000.00 |
| Sandoval County Historical Society |
Hire consultant to advise society in design of archival
storage space; develop archival/records management programs in both the Sandoval and
Corrales Historical Societies; develop a plan for collecting historic documents within the
county. |
4,130.00 |
1,720.00 |
5,850.00 |
| OCA - Hispanic Cultural Division |
Preservation of Barelas photograph collection. |
5,700.00 |
17,625.00 |
23,325.00 |
| Museum of NM Foundation / Museum of Indian Arts & Culture
/ Las of Anthropology |
Update database system and catalogue uncatalogued documents
and photographs. |
6,554.00 |
6,226.00 |
12,780.00 |
| Citizen's Committee for Historic Preservation |
Digitize photographs and update catalogue; re-house negatives
and glass plates dating from 1851. |
8,500.00 |
10,500.00 |
19,000.00 |
| University of NM Health Service Center |
Automate finding aids and make them accessible through the
Center's Web Page. |
3,330.00 |
2,900.00 |
6,230.00 |
| Artesia Historical Museum & Art Center |
Re-house the City Archives |
500.00 |
8,216.16 |
8,716.16 |
| Tularosa Basin Historical Society |
Assess and develop a plan to organize and preserve
collections. |
860.00 |
996.00 |
1,856.0 |
| Silver City Museum Society |
Microfilm and digitize selected collections. |
6,060.00 |
6,061.00 |
12,121.00 |
|
Total |
74,237.75 |
112,903.49 |
187,141.24 |
An Assessment of the Records and Information
Environment Within State Government
By Don Padilla
Records Management Division
The Records Management
Division, in conjunction with the State Archives and Historical Services Division,
conducted a records and information management survey of State agencies during the early
part of fiscal year 1999.
Information obtained through the
survey will be used by the State Records Center and Archives (SRCA) to modify its
strategic business plan that addresses the records and information needs of State
government. The ultimate goal of SRCAs strategic business plan is to achieve
its mission "to protect, preserve, provide access and promote the use of the
public records that document the rights and history of the people of New Mexico."
The questions used in the survey
were developed jointly with the Archives and Historical Services Division. The intent of
the questions was to obtain an overview of the records and information environment
throughout State government. This overview was obtained by surveying State agencies,
boards, commissions, and elected offices. On July 22, 1998, 437 survey forms were sent out
to 95 agency heads and 342 records liaison officers. There were 106 responses to the
survey.
Agencies
were asked a series of questions on inactive records on-site, permanent records stored
on-site, the use of Records Retention and Disposition Schedules (RRDS), Records and
Information Management workshops sponsored by SRCA, and the Public Records Act. Agencies
were also asked about the disposition of records in electronic media, electronic back-up,
vital records plan, and microphotography systems. The survey results appear to indicate
real challenges for the Records Management Division in the management of records and
information on electronic media. As suspected, there was an overall sense of not knowing
what is going on with electronic media.
The Records Management Division
will use the information provided by the survey to map out a course in a five-year
strategic plan to address on-site storage of inactive records, electronic media issues,
and improved methods for developing and presenting current records and information
management information.
A copy of the full report plus
response data tabulations is available from the Records Management Division.
Preserving New Mexicos
Historical Record Workshop
By Paula Varela
The New Mexico Historical
Records Advisory Board will be offering a free workshop titled, "Preserving New
Mexicos Historical Record." This workshop will be held on May 13-14, 1999, at
Zimmerman Library, on the University of New Mexico campus. The objective of the workshop
is to provide the necessary instruction to enable entities to use basic preservation and
conservation techniques. This workshop will also include hands-on practice of book and
paper treatment. Registration will be ongoing until May 1, 1999; however, class size is
limited to twenty people. To register for the workshop please call (505) 476-7902, or
write NM State Records Center and Archives, 1205 Camino Carlos Rey, Santa Fe, NM 87505.
Disposition
of E-mail
By Don Padilla
Records Management Division
Initially, E-mail was used
to arrange meeting dates and social events, confirm appointments, etc. With expanded
technical capabilities, E-mail is used to transmit and access a wide variety of
information. It is easier and faster to share documents "over the network" than
to prepare hard-copy correspondence. E-mail is now used to send official responses within
the governmental community and to the general public.
State and local government
entities need to recognize that E-mail as a communications vehicle can contain public
records. These records are subject to the same statutory provisions that govern all other
public records. E-mail records need to be managed in a similar fashion to records
maintained in other media.
Is E-mail a record? The
information contained in an E-mail message is considered a record. A record is
"information preserved by any technique in any medium now known, or later developed,
that can be recognized by ordinary human sensory capabilities either directly or with the
aid of technology" (1 NMAC 3.55). If the electronic information received or created
via an E-mail system is the basis for decision-making, explains or interprets policy, or
performs official office functions, then that information is a record as defined in
statute. Public records are "all books, papers, maps, photographs, or other
documentary materials, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by
any agency in pursuance of law or in connection with the transaction of public business,
preserved or appropriate for preservation, by the agency or its legitimate successor as
evidence of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, operations or
other activities of the government, or because of the informational and historical value
of data contained therein" (Public Records Act).
Non-records. There are categories
of uses that are typically not records. These "non-record" categories include
such things as arranging lunch or social appointments, confirming meeting dates, forwarded
copies of documents, phone messages, etc. These uses do not generally produce records that
need to be retained. Non-records are the convenience copies or drafts of records created
or received by public bodies. Non-records are not evidence of the activities of public
bodies. As such, these E-mail (non-record) messages should be deleted or disposed of as
soon as possible to cut down on the amount of electronic storage space being used for
E-mail.
Creating E-mail files. All E-mail
systems have some sort of directory or folder scheme to assist in organizing E-mail
communiques. Using the scheme available, "E-mail files" should be established
along the same lines used for setting-up hard files. As with hard files, the question that
needs to be asked is whether the information being received and/or sent is a record or
not. If the answer is yes, a method for ensuring retention and access to the information
should be selected.
When creating E-mail files,
agency staff should consult the Records Retention and Disposition Schedule (RRDS) for
their agency as well as the RRDS for general records. Creating E-mail files in
coordination with these schedules will assist State agencies in the disposition (deletion)
of E-mail files in accordance with 1 NMAC 3.2.50.1.9.3 Destruction of Public Records
(Agency destruction of public records). For example, GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE FILES (1 NMAC
3.2.90.10.A109) need to be retained for "1 year after close of fiscal year in which
created," then they may be destroyed. So despite the format, General Correspondence
Files must be retained for one year. By placing all of a years general
correspondence in a single E-mail file, it can all be deleted at the same time.
How long should E-mail be
retained? First, review E-mail files using agency RRDS and disposition policies. If E-mail
files include documentation similar to that contained in the RRDS, the E-mail should be
retained for the periods of time indicated. Depending upon the capacity of the personal
computer and/or the network, it may be necessary to copy E-mail files to diskettes or
other electronic storage devices in order to retain the files for the required period of
time (retention period). By removing E-mail files in accordance with RRDS and disposition
policies, computer storage space will be freed up.
Is there a procedure for
destroying records? The State Records Center and Archives is responsible for the timely
and appropriate destruction of all State public records. The State Records Administrator
has issued an administrative rule governing the destruction of State public records (1
NMAC 3.2.50.1 Destruction of Public Records).
The destruction of State public records must be approved
by the State Records Administrator and may occur on-site at the custodial agency or
through the State Records Center. State agencies that choose to store public records for
the life cycle of the records may either contact the State Records Center for transfer and
destruction or may elect to use the following procedure for disposition of public records.
The Records Liaison Officers of State agencies shall request in writing permission to
destroy public records.
The destruction of non-records is the sole
responsibility of the custodial entity and does not require the prior approval of the
State Records Administrator. That responsibility includes identifying whether the
information is a non-record or a public record as identified in the Records Retention and
Disposition Schedule. If it is in a current retention schedule, it is a public record. If
there is any doubt, it should be treated as a public record or contact the Records
Management Division (Agency Analysis Bureau) (505) 476-7907.
Historical
Society Annual Conference Set for Alamogordo
By Robert Torrez, State Historian
The 1999 Historical Society of New Mexico Annual
Conference will be held at Alamogordo, April 8-10. This year, the Society is pleased to
join its co-sponsor, the Alamogordo/Otero County Centennial Celebration Committee, in
observing the 100th anniversary of the creation of Otero County and the founding of the
City of Alamogordo.
The conference kicks off Thursday evening, April 8, with
registration at the Tays Special Events Center from 1:00 4:00 P. M. The Historical
Society Annual Meeting and Board of Directors Meeting will be held that afternoon at Tays
Center, followed by a reception for anyone attending the conference. At 7:00 P. M. the
International Space Hall of Fame will have a special showing at their OMNIMAX theatre. As
is customary at the annual conference, a number of book dealers and publishers will be
displaying and selling a great assortment books ranging from the rare and out-of-print
books to those hot off the presses.
Conference sessions begin at 9:00 A.M., Friday morning,
April 9, at the Alamogordo Civic Center on First Street. Sessions on Colonial New Mexico
and automation of archival collections kick off the scheduled presentations on Friday.
Subsequent presentations by a distinguished group of authorities on New Mexico history
will include papers on such diverse topics as the military in territorial New Mexico, to
tourism and libraries. A number of papers will also tell of some of New Mexicos
interesting personalities. Sessions devoted to the Hembrillo battlefield and the Tularosa
ditch litigation may be of special interest to folks in Otero County and the vicinity. A
session on General Stephen Watts Kearny will feature a paper by Kearnys great-great
granddaughter. At 5:00 P. M. the annual book auction will be held at the Elks Club. Hors
doeurves and a no- host bar will also be available to enhance this fun event.
Conference presentations continue
until noon on Saturday. That afternoon several local tours are scheduled, and the
conference will officially conclude Saturday evening with the annual awards banquet at the
Elks Club. On Sunday, day tours of the Orogrande mines and the Eugene Manlove Rhodes
Gravesite are planned. Tour information will be available at the registration desk.
If you wish to obtain an official program and
registration information call State Historian (and current Historical Society President)
Robert J. Torrez at (505) 476-7955. Programs and motel information will also be available
through the Alamogordo Chamber of Commerce at (505) 437-6120.
Free
Microfiche Readers
By James Clokey
Lemms Microfilm Services, Inc., in Rio
Rancho, is giving away microfiche readers . If you are interested, please call Mr. Lemm at
1-888-299-1513. If you have any questions regarding microfilming services, please call
James Clokey with the Micrographics Bureau of the State Records Center & Archives,
476-7930.
San
Miguel County Territorial
Adoption Records (1891-1911)
By Daphne Arnaiz DeLeon
Archives & Historical Services Bureau
During the last two decades of the New Mexico
Territorial Period (1893-1912), adoptions (also called legitimizations) were conducted by
the county probate courts. Adoption statutes stipulated that the applicants would be bound
to their adoptive child as if he/she were their natural child and the adopted child in
turn would be bound to the adoptive parents as if they were his/her natural parents. These
reciprocal relationships lasted the lifetime of the adopted child and the adoptive
parents. The various statues (1853,1870,1893), enacted by the Territorial Legislative
Assembly, governing adoptions established a system whereby certain types of documents were
created by the applicants and by the probate court. These documents were:
Petition/Declaration A formal request submitted
to the court by applicants to legally adopt a minor (person less than 21 years of age). A
petition had to contain the following information: if the applicant was married or single;
if the applicant was married did he/she have legitimate heirs; the birth age or
circumstances of the adopted child; and the reasons why adoption would be advantageous to
the adopted child. This petition often included at the bottom of the document a sworn
statement by the applicant of the veracity of the facts in the petition.
Consent of the natural parents If the natural
parents were capable of presenting themselves at the probate court, then a statement of
consent would be signed in court. If the natural parents were not able to be present in
the court than a written consent could be presented in their place.
Court Order/Certificate of Adoption After
the probate judge had reviewed the petition, and if he granted the adoption, he created
this document as proof that the applicants had legally adopted a minor.
Other Documents Some adoption cases contain
affidavits, summons, and guardianship records.
Contained within the San Miguel County Records
Probate Court subseries is one-half linear foot of adoption records. These records span
approximately the last two decades of New Mexicos Territorial Period (1891-1911) and
are primarily petitions filed in the San Miguel Probate Court by applicants. Petitions
contain important familial information for the genealogist and the historian.
One example of a petition from the San Miguel County
Records-Probate Court subseries is the request for the adoption of Mary, Portia, and
Douglas Field by the Childrens Home Society of New Mexico and Arizona (1909). The
1893 statute, enacted by the Territorial Assembly, stated that "Any minor child may
be adopted by any adult person or charitable association, or incorporation organized and
existing for the custody, care, maintenance, and education of orphan, illegitimate,
abandoned, and other children
" This petition is the only example of a
charitable organization requesting to adopt a child in the San Miguel County
Probate Court subseries.
The petition begins with the presentation of the
"charitable association" and the reasons as to why adoption would benefit the
children. The genealogist/historian discovers in reading the entire document the age of
the children, the names of their natural parents, the fact that the father has abandoned
the children, and that the mother is "mentally unbalanced."
The value of these adoption records is heightened by the
scarcity of these types of documents in the Archives county collections and their
confidentiality in the 20th century. Adoption records after 1912 are legally sealed and
restricted and are in the custody of the New Mexico Bureau of Vital Records and Health
Statistics.
Legislative Actions Concerning Rulemaking
By Al Regensberg
State Rules Division
Several interesting bills were introduced at the
recently concluded regular session of the New Mexico Legislature.
House Bill 599, introduced by Representative Thomas C.
Taylor, sought to constrain agency rulemaking and limit the number of promulgated rules.
The bill required that for every new rule or every amendment which substantially extended
the scope of a rule, another rule would be repealed. This one-for-one requirement was
excepted when an agency was issuing rules in direct response to new enabling statutes.
This legislation, if enacted, would have prompted agencies engaged in rulemaking to review
their current rules. If requested, the Rules Division would have supported their efforts
by producing lengthy reports showing each current rule itemized by agency, description,
filing date and other factors.
Senate Bill 146 introduced by Senator Pauline Eisenstadt
proposed changes to the Electronic Authentication of Documents Act to clarify its purpose
and change certain definitions. Changes made to the definitions section include
definitions of "certificate" and "digital signature" and replacement
of "secure hash code" with the synonymous but preferred term "message
digest function." This bill was signed by Governor Gary Johnson and will require the
Rules Division to change its rule, 1 NMAC 3.2.70.2 "Electronic Authentication"
for adoption by the Commission of Public Records. Successful implementation of the
Electronic Authentication of Documents Act is essential if the Rules Division is to
develop an effective electronic rules environment.
Senate Bill 579 introduced by Senator Leonard Lee Rawson
and its companion House Bill 721 introduced by Rep. Thomas C. Taylor established a
timetable to sunset every State agency by July 1, 2002, unless the agency were
re-authorized by the legislature based upon a recommendation by the Sunset Commission
(also established by the bill). Senate Bill 579 was amended to delete constitutional
entities from the list of agencies subject to the bill. One section of the bill required
every State agency subject to the Act to review its rules within six months of the
effective date of the Act and then update them annually. Additionally, agencies were
required to submit a report to the Sunset Commission on a yearly basis. The Rules Division
would likely have been asked to generate reports for each agency and for the Sunset
Commission in its oversight of the process. Also, the Rules Division, as a part of the
State Records Center and Archives, would have been required to conduct a yearly review of
its own rules to validate their purpose.
ORGANIZATION OF NORTHERN
NEW MEXICO GENEALOGY GROUP
Sandra Jaramillo
Archives & Historical Services Division
A genealogical group, affiliated with the
New Mexico Hispanic Genealogical Society, has been formed. Memberships are being solicited
from the North Central counties of Santa Fe, Los Alamos, Rio Arriba, Taos, San Miguel,
Mora, and Colfax counties. Meetings will be held once a month in Santa Fe. For more
information please call Clara Gonzales at (505) 471-5901 or (505) 471-3956.
MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION OF PUBLIC RECORDS
Thomas Livesay, Chair
Director, Museum of New Mexico
The Honorable Domingo Martinez,
State Auditor
Thaddeus Bejnar, Law Librarian
Supreme Court Law Library
The Honorable Rebecca Vigil-Giron,
Secretary of State
Ted
Guambaņa,
for Secretary Steven Beffort
General Services Department
The Honorable Patricia Madrid,
Attorney General
Dr. Stanley Hordes,
Historian
Any questions or comments may be directed to
Elaine Olah, State Records Administrator at (505) 476-7911. If you would like to receive a
copy of our newsletter, contact Paula Varela at (505) 476-7902, by e-mail at
pvarela@rain.state.nm.us, or by mail at NM State Records Center and Archives, 1205 Camino
Carlos Rey, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505. |